Jordan Thompson vs Jason Murray Kubler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

J. Thompson vs J. Murray Kubler

Jordan Thompson
Jordan Thompson

Flag AUS AUS

l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
Jason Murray Kubler
Jason Murray Kubler

Flag AUS AUS

w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l

1

Win

2

Played

1

Win

31
Age
32
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
78
C. Rank
185
26
Best Rank
63
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$4.4M
Career Money
$1.2M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Thompson 1 - 1 Kubler

They have played 5 sets in total, with Jordan Thompson winning 2 and Jason Murray Kubler winning 3. The last match between Jason Murray Kubler and Jordan Thompson was at the Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 11-07-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Thompson1
Kubler1
Last H2H Matches:

(R1Hall of Fame Open - Newport(07-11-22)

Grass
AUS Flag
Jason Murray Kubler
6
6
AUS Flag
Jordan Thompson
2
3

(SFSeoul Challenger(05-05-18)

Hard
AUS Flag
Jordan Thompson
6
3
6
AUS Flag
Jason Murray Kubler
3
6
4

J. Thompson vs J. M. Kubler H2H Profile

Stats
$4,385,565Career Prize Money$1,243,795
59.60% (475-322)Career Total W/L67.57% (448-215)
0Grass1
1Hard0
17Titles25
1Total H2H Matches1
46.15% (12-14)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

J. Thompson vs J. M. Kubler Match Preview

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jordan Thompson has won 51.31% of points on their second serve, while Jason Murray Kubler has won 43.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jordan Thompson, in recent form, has won 39.90% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jason Murray Kubler has won 46.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.68% and 20.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Jordan Thompson has saved 63.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jason Murray Kubler has saved 56.50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Jordan Thompson has won 48.48% of matches played (W/L 16/ 17), with Jason Murray Kubler winning 78.85% (W/L 16/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Jordan Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 41/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 88/ 67). Jason Murray Kubler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 249/ 106), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10).
  • Player level: In the last year, Jordan Thompson has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/ 6), where as Jason Murray Kubler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 86.21% of matches (W/L 25/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jordan Thompson winning 1 times and Jason Murray Kubler being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Jordan Thompson winning 2 and Jason Murray Kubler winning 3. The last match between Jason Murray Kubler and Jordan Thompson was at the Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 11-07-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:25.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jordan Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 57.94 while Jason Murray Kubler has played against players with an average rank of 413.48.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jordan Thompson has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jason Murray Kubler has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Jordan Thompson has converted 24.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jason Murray Kubler has converted 35.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jordan Thompson vs Jason Murray Kubler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Thompson vs J. M. Kubler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won1
2Sets Won3
20Games Won25
8Aces (Total)7
4Total Double Faults10
1:36:25Avg. Match Time1:36:25
72% (87/121)1st Serve %65% (88/136)
74% (64/87)1st Serve Win %75% (66/88)
44% (15/34)2nd Serve Win %52% (25/48)
60% (3/5)Break Pts Won %56% (5/9)
33% (45/136)Return Pts Won %35% (42/121)
50% (1/2)Best‑of‑3 Win %50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won → Match Won100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won → Match Lost0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Lost → Match Won0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Thompson 55%, Kubler 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Thompson 45%, Kubler 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Thompson 62%, Kubler 66%.

J. Thompson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardChengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025

R1

CHIA. Tabilo
L
6-4 6-3
HardDavis Cup, World Group, Q2, AUS-BEL 2-3 - 08-09-2025

Rubber 2

BELZ. Bergs
L
7-6(4) 6-4
HardU.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025

R2

FRAA. Mannarino
L
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3

R1

FRAC. Moutet
W
6-2 6-4 1-6 6-3
HardCincinnati Open - Cincinnati - 04-08-2025

R1

FRAA. Mannarino
L
6-2 6-2

J. M. Kubler Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardU.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025

Q3

CROD. Prizmic
L
6-3 4-6 6-1

Q2

FRAK. Jacquet
W
6-4 6-2

Q1

GBRG. Loffhagen
W
6-4 7-5
ClayFrench Open - Paris - 26-05-2025

Q2

JPNJ. Kent
L
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3

Q1

ESPA. Moro
W
6-4 3-6 6-2
banner

J. Thompson vs J. M. Kubler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
59.60% (475/322)YTD Win/Loss67.57% (448/215)
56.56% (1100/845)Sets Win/Loss64.34% (994/551)
52.56% (9804/8850)Games Win/Loss55.35% (8039/6484)
60.18% (269/178)Hard Win/Loss66.39% (160/81)
56.77% (88/67)Clay Win/Loss70.14% (249/106)
63.51% (47/27)Indoor Hard W/L37.50% (6/10)
58.68% (71/50)Grass Win/Loss64.71% (33/18)
0.43Aces Per Game0.31
3937Aces Total2170
0.14Double Faults Per Game0.26
1286Total Double Faults1842
1:31:28Average Match Time1:9:52
464.66Average Opponent Rank515.27
62% (31017/49896)1st Serve %61% (19296/31438)
72% (22214/31017)1st Serve Win %72% (13810/19296)
52% (9753/18878)2nd Serve Win %51% (6152/12141)
40% (1851/4616)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (1432/3261)
38% (19243/50729)Return Points Win %40% (12767/31753)
39.44% (28/43)Slam W/L51.92% (27/25)
49.21% (31/32)Masters W/L36.36% (4/7)
50.00% (5/5)Cups W/L50.00% (1/1)
49.05% (103/107)Main Tour W/L47.06% (24/27)
68.13% (218/102)Challenger W/L67.21% (166/81)
73.77% (90/32)Futures W/L75.33% (226/74)
61% (436/711)Best of 3 Sets Win %69% (429/622)
42% (30/72)Best of 5 Sets Win %48% (15/31)
55% (162/297)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)55% (112/203)
57% (145/254)Deciding Set Win %57% (107/187)
86% (454/390)1st Set Won, Won Match90% (427/386)
14% (454/64)1st Set Won, Lost Match9% (427/38)
24% (343/84)1st Set Lost, Won Match26% (236/61)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?